How to get the maximum value from MES

summary

Implementing a manufacturing execution system (MES) requires detailed planning and knowledge as well as strategic implementation and knowledge on typical implementation issues. This article contains best practices and challenges that ensure that MES implementation provides the greatest value for your manufacturing operations.

Before you can start an MES implementation project, you need to build a strategic foundation through planning. Deploying MES must begin by defining ways in which organizations can achieve their corporate goals. Rather than maintaining a standalone technical solution, systems become a deliberate addition when properly aligned with business goals.

Organizations must perform a full assessment to determine both problems and opportunities in their manufacturing operations. You need to understand how your manufacturing execution system supports your operational goals. This includes time savings, improved product quality and standard compliance.

Next, create a specific measurable target that describes the implementation of the MES project.

Choose the right solution

The choice of the right MES software exists as a key determinant for successful implementation. All MESs have different capabilities and organizations must conduct detailed assessments to find the right fit. The assessment process requires assessing vendors through sector knowledge, solution adaptability and growth potential, and commitment to supporting the business from present to future needs.

When evaluating MES systems, organizations need to decide on the appropriate level of customization and standardization that suits their needs. Customized solutions provide optimal alignment, but typically require additional costs and long installation times. The system must be seamlessly integrated with current systems, particularly with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Legacy, Supervision and Data Collection (SCADA) and Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC).

Implementation Framework and Approach

A suitable framework for implementation is essential for successful MES deployment through system integration, along with scalability and process continuity.

A step-by-step implementation approach. A complete implementation of MES throughout the operation is too complicated to handle during one deployment. With a step-by-step approach,

Implementation is easier to manage, troubleshoot, and reduces operational failures for current activities. Fast-to-read benefits in priority areas

Feature-based implementations exist as a better strategy than trying to implement a complete system from the start. This approach provides agility while increasing flexibility to handle specific issues through systematic methods.

Integration strategy. Implementing MES faces significant integration challenges when operating existing system infrastructure. To overcome this:

MES, if present, must be directly linked to current ERP systems, along with SCM and all other related systems. The integration plan should be clarified at the beginning of implementation. The integration process between MES and legacy systems requires careful evaluation of the implementation of middleware solutions. System integrators with Experience and MES vendors that demonstrate excellent integration capabilities must be brought in for collaboration.

Data Management and Analysis

The full potential of MES relies on effective data management along with the deployment of strategic analytics.

Ensures data quality. MES produces the highest values ​​through accurate data processing operations. A robust data verification system must be created to verify the accuracy of the data used by MES. Implementing MES requires data governance and cleansing practices before starting the process. To maintain current information, periodic data audits must be performed in conjunction with ongoing maintenance of the data source.

Use analysis. MES analysis tools allow organizations to gain meaningful insights from operational data. You need to track the key performance indicator (KPI). Analyzing production data reveals operational bottlenecks and allows opportunities for process improvement. Real-time data allows production managers to make decisions based on process information.

Change Management and User Recruitment

User recruitment and training play a key role in maximizing the benefits of MES, as it directly affects both the effectiveness of the system and overall manufacturing productivity.

Stakeholder engagement. Implementation must include stakeholders from all relevant teams that need to be involved at the start of the project. A dedicated team of producers, information technology (IT) staff, quality management specialists and management personnel must oversee implementation. All staff need thorough early knowledge of the implementation of planned MES solutions. Organizations need to maintain regular meetings at various levels to ensure universal understanding.

Training and support. The success of adopting a system depends heavily on providing extensive training to all users.

Development training for robust training programs tailored to a variety of user roles includes practical practice combined with web-based materials and ongoing technical support. Operators need to understand the improvements in the work that MES brings to their operations.

Common pitfalls to avoid

Identifying common implementation challenges allows better prediction and handling of potential difficulties that may arise.

Lack of proper planning. Implementing MES can easily get back on track if the implementation team doesn’t have a clear understanding of their objectives, resources and timelines. To begin implementation, a detailed assessment of the current process must be carried out along with resources and goals. The implementation process requires an evaluation of the MES to determine the ability to work with current infrastructure and connect with other systems.

Poor communication. During the MES implementation, various stakeholders need effective communication to avoid misunderstandings and project delays.

This project requires a defined communications framework that is combined with a specific project management system. Teams should maintain regular sessions, combined with progress reports and feedback opportunities. As soon as an employee appears early in the process, he takes action to resolve employee concerns.

Resistance to change. The MES implementation process leads to changes in the process that affects existing workflows. Production staff must participate in implementation activities from the first moment of the project. This system shows staff how to enhance operational tasks. Organizations need to listen to feedback and resolve employee concerns as soon as possible.

Overly customised. Over-customization brings both project delays and higher costs, creating system performance issues and difficulties for future upgrades. To balance standardization and customization, you need to identify core features that maintain standard, whilst customizing only aspects that are essential to a unique process.

The test is insufficient. There is no proper test, which results in price-intensive errors. A complete test procedure is required at every stage of the implementation process.

The testing process should include three types of evaluation: functional tests, integration tests, and user acceptance tests. The testing process requires qualified staff with the right skills and experience.

I’ll summarize

Successful MES implementation requires a structured approach, strategic deployment and continuous optimization. By following these best practices, manufacturers can maximize the benefits of MES investments, including improving production efficiency, improving quality control, and improving operational visibility. While a journey to outstanding manufacturing through MES implementation can be challenging, rewards in terms of competitive advantage and improved operational performance are worth the effort.

This feature was originally featured in the June/July issue of Automation.com Monthly.

Download the June/July issue of Automation.com every month